Emergent congregations are especially well equipped to live creatively in the newly post-Western Christianity. They are careful not to confuse the life and message of Jesus with the “Western” elements in which it has been packaged. They try to assign equal weight to both the message and the context so that a new version of the old story can take shape. They strongly underline “living the message” rather than simply proclaiming it. They experiment with settings, like cafes, in which two-way exchange rather than one-way preaching is possible
The Future of Faith (Cox, Harvey)
The words above are one of the reasons I have such hope for the emergent movement currently taking place in Jesus’ church throughout the world. After studying the history of the church it has become obvious to me just how much of Jesus’ message has been twisted into man’s messages. We need to strip away the worldly cultural part of the message so that its true heart can once again be glorified.
I am part Native-American and have read what the Christian missionaries did to that population. To me it was abominable how they tried to force their culture on the native population in this country at the same time strip their native culture away from them. It just wasn’t good enough to these early american missionaries to try to meld the two cultures together. They shamefully deemed their culture superior and determined to eradicate the other.
The message of Jesus Christ is what it is all about; the context from which the message is communicated is secondary in nature. Why didn’t these early missionaries understand that? But even how the message is delivered is not as important as living it in your life. If you don’t do that then you are rightly proclaimed to be a hypocrite.
“Doing church” is something that I have often been critical of in this blog because I believe it is often the same as putting the context above the message. I still quite clearly remember when I suggested that the Lutheran church where I was a very active member do a second different format service on Sundays. I remember the immediate and adamant opposition to the very idea coming from the clergyman and many of the long time members. That was maybe the beginning of my separation from that group.
I admire many emergent churches for trying different setting for “doing church”. Cafes, two-way exchanges in place one-way preaching and thousand year old liturgy, just might be a better way to present Jesus to a new generation. Why are so many resistant to that idea. When the method of delivery becomes more important than the message of Jesus it is time to step back and take a thoughtful look at how you are doing church.
2 thoughts on “Living The Message….”
A lot of the issue of why people are resistant, in my opinion, is that old adage “because we’ve always done it that way”. If you haven’t read it, I suggest “Pagan Christianity” by Frank Viola and George Barna. It gives a pretty good history of the development of how “church” became what it is today. I agree that a revisit of the personal touch of ministry and meeting people where they are (like Paul in Acts 17 “I see that you are very religious in all respects”) is what is needed today. Do you have a listing of the books you have/are reading during your journey?
Thanks for the comments. Yes, I have read many books on the subject of religion but I don’t really care to put them in a published list. That seems to just give fodder to some to put a label on me in one aspect or another. But I do have about 140 books on my Kindle right now and at least half are of the religious nature and that’s just the tip of the iceberg. 🙂